Three Anecdotes from the DARPA Autonomous Land Vehicle Project
نویسنده
چکیده
The DARPA Autonomous Land Vehicle (ALV) was a 12-foot tall, eight-wheeled robot with multiple sensors, tasked to go from point A to point B without human intervention in the hills outside of Denver in about 1985. This was a large applied research effort that presented many opportunities for unusual experiences. In one such experience, I was called in, at the last minute, to help improve our ALV proposal. The proposal was a 300-page document that segued smoothly from problem description to corporate capabilities and managerial plan, omitting any mention of technical approach. This taught me a rule of thumb I have seen validated many times: the larger the project (in dollars and scope), the poorer the technical proposal. In a second experience, I was demonstrating a dynamic programming algorithm at a quarterly review. The algorithm found minimum time paths from all points to a goal, set in an open field. I clicked a starting point, and the system traced a route that detoured to use a nearby road. I clicked closer to the goal, and the detour was more pronounced. When I clicked right next to the goal, the optimal path was horribly convoluted—it went away from the goal and to a road, which it followed around a long hogback ridge before departing crosscountry for the objective. I had to offer the sponsor something by way of explanation, so I looked at him and said, “We just spent $200,000 of your money to learn that roads are a good idea.” A third experience occured when I was at the computer, writing code for a new route-planning algorithm. A senior manager and a vice president of the firm came in, so I told them what I was doing. One said, “make it more AI-like,” while the other wanted “a more engineering approach.” That goal conflict literally ran backwards from my fingertips, through my corporate management, and into DARPA, where they were debating the same question. The resolution pushed the ALV project in the applied direction and influenced later DARPA efforts.
منابع مشابه
Winning the DARPA Grand Challenge with an AI Robot
This paper describes the software architecture of Stanley, an autonomous land vehicle developed for high-speed desert driving without human intervention. The vehicle recently won the DARPA Grand Challenge, a major robotics competition. The article describes the software architecture of the robot, which relied pervasively on state-of-the-art AI technologies, such as machine learning and probabil...
متن کاملCreating a High-Level Control Module for an Autonomous Mobile Robot Operating in an Urban Environment
The DARPA Urban Challenge is a government-sponsored competition scheduled for November 2007. The challenge is to create a fully autonomous vehicle built upon a street-legal frame that can navigate an urban driving environment. Naturally, urban driving environments require the vehicle to obey traffic laws, interact properly with other vehicles on the road, and generally drive much like a human w...
متن کاملSteering Control of the Autonomous Vehicle: CajunBot
This paper describes the steering controller of the CajunBot II, an autonomous vehicle designed for the DARPA Urban Challenge. The autonomous vehicle is a modified Jeep Wrangler Rubicon equipped with INS/GPS for localization, three sets of sensors and three single board computers. The control objective is to make the lateral error at a certain point ahead of the vehicle zero. The distance of th...
متن کاملThe MIT - Cornell Collision and Why It Happened
Mid-way through the 2007 DARPA Urban Challenge, MIT’s autonomous Land Rover LR3 ‘Talos’ and Team Cornell’s autonomous Chevrolet Tahoe ‘Skynet’ collided in a low-speed accident, one of the first well-documented collisions between two full-size autonomous vehicles. This collaborative study between MIT and Cornell examines the root causes of the collision, which are identified in both teams’ syste...
متن کاملDARPA Urban Challenge – Highland Racing
The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001, Public Law 106-398, Congress mandated in Section 220 that “It shall be a goal of the Armed Forces to achieve the fielding of unmanned, remotely controlled technology such that... by 2015, one-third of the operational ground combat vehicles are unmanned” [1]. In response to the congressional mandate, the Defense Advanced Research Proje...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- AI Magazine
دوره 29 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2008